President Donald Trump reportedly took to Truth Social Saturday to urge Senate Majority Leader John Thune to halt “long weekends” and cancel the August recess, pushing the chamber to accelerate confirmations of his administration’s nominees. “We need them badly!!!” Trump declared.
His message reflects a broader frustration with business-as-usual Senate tradition.
Trump praised legislative progress over the past six months—citing his team’s momentum—and urged Thune to override typical scheduling to ensure his “incredible nominees” receive timely approval ahead of next spring’s legislative agenda.
Trump’s push followed closely on heels of revelations by Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard, who disclosed that the Obama-era intelligence community suppressed a 2016 analysis concluding Russia had not influenced that year’s election.
“We had, in President Obama … people who did not want to accept the will of the American people in electing Donald Trump,” Gabbard said, accusing officials of orchestrating a “years-long coup” through the intelligence apparatus.
Trump’s argument extends beyond ideological points: he frames the push for confirmations as a national imperative.
By urging the Senate to skip recess, he signals impatience with delays that leave critical posts unfilled, hamper governance, and stall implementation of key initiatives.
Thune has hinted at openness to recess adjustments, describing the recent six-month string of Trump-era achievements as “many victories.”
His willingness marks a departure from conventional Senate procedure—particularly in the depths of August when pro forma sessions typically forestall recess appointments.
For conservatives, absent nominees mean stalled policies—from judicial appointments to executive-agency leadership.
Trump contends that delaying confirmation is no longer viable, warning that extended vacuums in federal offices hinder both oversight and service delivery.
Yet the proposal may face resistance within the GOP.
Cancelling the August recess challenges longstanding Senate prerogatives and could spark backlash among members who cherish time in their districts, fundraising, or campaigning.
Still, Trump’s growing influence in the party, coupled with signals from Thune that “long weekends” might yield to urgency, suggests the proposal is being viewed seriously.
As the Senate considers extending its session, Trump’s demand also serves as a loyalty filter—an implicit test of Republican unity behind his agenda. It recalls past commentary about “recess appointments” and executive assertiveness.
For voters, the debate pits Washington’s pace against Trump’s priorities. Will Senate leaders preserve tradition, or pivot toward expediency to enact the incoming administration’s agenda?
[READ MORE: Scott Jennings Shreds ‘Weird AF’ Democrats, Asks Why They Can’t Just Be ‘Normal’]
